The investigation into the responsibility for the 228 Massacre has been a key focus of the Memorial Foundation of 228 in recent years. This research report was completed after over a year of collaboration among historians and legal scholars convened by the foundation's “228 Massacre Truth Research Task Force.” It offers a thorough analysis of the responsibility of government decision-makers, implementers, “BanShan,” social group members, and media workers involved in the event. This report is the most representative study on the responsibility for the 228 Massacre since the 1992 Executive Yuan’s “228 Massacre Research Report.”
了解臺灣的歷史,必須「從頭講起」,從頭了解起,我們的視野拉長、拉廣了,然後當我們回頭看這個島嶼的歷史,才能更真切地感受到它的獨特,進而珍惜它的多樣...
本書以白色恐怖為背景,剖析國家機器如何透過法令運作,造成無數無辜者遭審判與犧牲。強調理解法制脈絡,才能看見歷史的不公與違法本質,並指出「和解」並非...
比推理小說還精采的重大犯罪! 英國自然史博物館創館以來最離奇的竊案! 華萊士可能作夢都想不到, 他費盡心力在南美洲紀錄鳥類、於馬來群島帶回世界第...
臺灣白色恐怖第一起、牽連甚廣的冤案 從千金小姐到政治寡婦 受害人遺孀與六名兒女的動人傳記 「白色恐怖,從來都是不分省籍的, 這塊土地曾經歷的許多傷痛,...
既然做不了中國人和日本人,那讓我們做臺灣人吧。 十九世紀尾聲,臺灣成為日本殖民地,入列帝國主義下追尋自我的弱小民族成員。 「成為臺灣人」或「福爾摩...
唯有讀懂戰後歷史,才能透澈了解今日的台灣! 吳重雨(前國立交通大學校長) 陳翠蓮(國立台灣大學歷史學系教授) 簡明仁(財團法人大眾教育基金會董事長) ...
帝國之門,從臺灣打開 臺灣不只是被統治的島嶼,而是推動日本南進的實驗場、橋梁與發動機 透過殖民地的視角,重新解讀日治歷史,揭示跨越海域的亞洲格局
日本學者眼中,猶如眾神樂園般的深邃南國 從歷史、文學與口傳,解讀南臺灣的複雜今日 17章奇譚 × 章末附怪談專欄 × 高雄插畫家Croter封面繪製 一條即將被拆...
「從野球到棒球,串起台日的百年情誼,展現台灣立足世界的決心和氣魄!」 ──總統賴清德 力薦 野球 × 棒球 擊破國界,揮出台日交流紅不讓
這不是一本講述台灣之光、正宗在地食材的飲食書。作者們透過九個與農業相關的故事,想要揭示更複雜、歧義,卻真正運作的如實世界。透過田野調查,作者展現風...
英語世界關於臺灣早期歷史最具代表性的作品,重新定位平埔族群在臺灣歷史發展中的關鍵角色。 十七及十八世紀中國人口及經濟成長的趨勢,如何與朝代和政治制...
開啟極地大探險時代的一次航行 傳奇極地探險家羅爾德.阿蒙森征服南極旅程的起點 人類第一次見識到海冰的威力 以及寒冷與黑暗能夠如何蹂躪人的靈魂 ★Am...
「一本在最近三十年出現的新的史料條件以及研究成果上,展現臺灣戰後政治史研究新水準的作品。」 ──若林正丈(東京大學、早稻田大學名譽教授,《戰後臺灣政...
☆★在壓抑的戒嚴時期,臺灣人依然奮力追尋民主的春天☆★ ☆★陳健民(香港占中三子之一)、陳俊宏(國家人權博物館館長)專文推薦☆★ #本書原名《百年追求卷三....
Welcome to Taiwan!這裡曾經是文明落後的鬼島,也是物產豐饒的寶島; 屬於這片土地的歷史,讓我們一起來解鎖! 金石堂、博客來人文史地榜暢銷作家全新力作...
Seeking truth and due responsibility for the 228 Massacre has been the long-time goal for the 228 Massacre victims and their families. It is also the pursuit of the 228 Memorial Foundation since my assumption as the foundation chairman. After the 87th board meeting on September 2003, which approved the establishment of a “228 Massacre Truth Research Task Force,” a 7-member name-list was nominated by Administrator Lee Wang-Tai. The list included academic board members Chang Yan-Hsian, Huang Hsiu-Cheng, Hsueh Hua-Yuan and Chen Yi-Shen; representative of the victims and their families Jhong Yi-Ren and Lee Rong-Chang; and Administrator Lee Wang-Tai himself. Task force members then jointly suggested board member Chang Yan-Hsian to serve as the team’s convener. In a bid to avoid overlap with that of the 228 Massacre Research Report issued by the Executive Yuan on 1992, Administrator Lee proposed during the 88th board meeting to have the task force’s research report be named: Research Report on Responsibility For The 228 Massacre. Its editorial orientations included: 1) clarifying decision and implementations undertook by the central and local governments during the 228 Massacre; 2) probing relevant historical, political and legal responsibilities, and 3) analyzing roles played by key participants in the 228 Massacre.
The outline of the research project was drafted by board member Huang Hsiu-Cheng and was finalized after rounds of discussion by members of the task force. In a bid to strengthen the editors’ force members of prominent historical and legal Responsibility For The 228 Massacre academics such as Lee Hsiao-Feng, Chen Tsui-Lien, Ho I-Lin, Chen Tze-Lung, and Huang Mao-Rong were invited to take part in the project as well. Since the launch of the task force, one or two meetings had been convened monthly. Given that many were busy with their daytime jobs, the meetings oftentimes took place in the evenings. I personally am in awe of the effort and hard-work put forth by each of the task force members whom-----in the hope to complete the research report with preciseness and a more convincing conclusion-----painstakingly took part in discussions and researches, even when it meant sacrificing their own break time. During the discussion process, timely participation and first-hand information contributed by the 228 Massacre victims and their families has also allowed a more completed discourse of the subject matter and enabled the content to closely reflect what truly took place then during the 228 Massacre.
Probing truth and clarifying due responsibility are the must in smoothing the scars caused by the 228 Massacre. They also serve as the directions to strive for in resolving mistrust and conflict among the ethnic groups. Choosing to forget, or relaying the 228 Massacre with smattering knowledge, do not help the people face the 228 Massacre rationally with sincere, let alone allow people to transcend the past and achieve the eventual goal of ethnic harmony and co-existence.
Hereby it is my sincere hope that the goals can be accomplished via the publication of this research report.
(The speech was delivered by Chairman Chen Chin-Huang at the new book presentation of Research Report on Responsibility For 228 Massacre)
根據台灣現行法規,數位內容( 如電子書、音樂、影片、遊戲、App )形式之商品,不受「網購服務需提供七日鑑賞期」的限制。為維護您的權益,建議您先使用「試讀」功能後再付款購買。